Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

17 July 2007

• 00:18   Re: TRUNCATE TABLE Tom Lane
• 14:31   Postgres configuration for 64 CPUs, 128 GB RAM... Marc Mamin
• 15:04   Re: Postgres configuration for 64 CPUs, 128 GB RAM... Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 15:48   Re: Postgres configuration for 64 CPUs, 128 GB RAM... Jim C. Nasby
• 16:18   Re: Postgres configuration for 64 CPUs, 128 GB RAM... Gregory Stark
• 16:46   Re: Postgres configuration for 64 CPUs, 128 GB RAM... Greg Smith
• 17:43   Re: Postgres configuration for 64 CPUs, 128 GB RAM... Strong, David
• 18:02   Re: Postgres configuration for 64 CPUs, 128 GB RAM... PFC
• 18:51   large number of connected connections to postgres database (v8.0) Fei Liu
• 19:39   insert vs select into performance Thomas Finneid
• 19:55   Re: insert vs select into performance Michael Glaesemann
• 20:17   Re: insert vs select into performance Arjen van der Meijden
• 20:31   Re: insert vs select into performance Tom Lane
• 20:50   Re: insert vs select into performance Thomas Finneid
• 20:58   Re: insert vs select into performance Thomas Finneid
• 20:59   Re: insert vs select into performance Michael Stone
• 20:59   Re: insert vs select into performance Mark Lewis
• 21:01   Re: insert vs select into performance Thomas Finneid
• 21:07   Re: insert vs select into performance Michael Glaesemann
• 21:11   Re: insert vs select into performance Thomas Finneid
• 21:13   Re: insert vs select into performance PFC
• 21:27   Re: insert vs select into performance Thomas Finneid
• 21:44   importance of fast disks with pg Thomas Finneid
• 21:54   Re: importance of fast disks with pg Dan Harris
• 22:29   ionice to make vacuum friendier? Ron Mayer