Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

9 October 2006

• 01:03   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Josh Berkus
• 01:09   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James
• 01:14   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane
• 02:12   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Bruce Momjian
• 02:41   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood
• 02:45   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James
• 02:48   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Craig A. James
• 03:03   Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Jim C. Nasby
• 03:06   Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Jim C. Nasby
• 03:10   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Chris Browne
• 03:38   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Mark Kirkwood
• 04:44   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane
• 13:49   Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Merlin Moncure
• 14:02   autovacuum not working? Medora Schauer
• 14:11   Re: autovacuum not working? Bill Moran
• 14:19   Re: Performance Optimization for Dummies 2 - the SQL Merlin Moncure
• 14:27   Re: autovacuum not working? Medora Schauer
• 17:12   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Josh Berkus
• 17:42   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane
• 18:22   odd variances in count(*) times Merlin Moncure
• 18:30   Re: odd variances in count(*) times Stephen Frost
• 18:41   Re: odd variances in count(*) times Merlin Moncure
• 18:45   Re: odd variances in count(*) times Steinar H. Gunderson
• 19:04   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Chris Browne
• 20:31   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Scott Marlowe
• 21:18   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby
• 21:24   Re: odd variances in count(*) times Jim C. Nasby
• 21:26   Re: autovacuum not working? Jim C. Nasby
• 21:33   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tobias Brox
• 22:30   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Jim C. Nasby
• 22:40   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane
• 22:41   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Joshua D. Drake
• 22:45   Re: Simple join optimized badly? Tom Lane