Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

12 September 2006

• 00:57   Re: Abysmal hash join Gregory Stark
• 01:53   Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody Merlin Moncure
• 07:18   Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody Piñeiro
• 10:17   Poor performance on seq scan Laszlo Nagy
• 10:47   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:50   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Luke Lonergan
• 12:15   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Laszlo Nagy
• 12:37   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Laszlo Nagy
• 12:37   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Guillaume Cottenceau
• 12:47   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Guillaume Cottenceau
• 13:25   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Heikki Linnakangas
• 13:33   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Alvaro Herrera
• 13:45   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:27   Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody Scott Marlowe
• 14:29   Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody Scott Marlowe
• 14:52   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Tom Lane
• 15:10   Reg - Autovacuum krishnaraj D
• 15:13   Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody Tom Lane
• 15:19   Re: Reg - Autovacuum Chris Mair
• 15:38   Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody Merlin Moncure
• 16:07   [Fwd: Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody] Piñeiro
• 16:20   Re: [Fwd: Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared Scott Marlowe
• 16:22   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Luke Lonergan
• 16:52   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Tom Lane
• 17:02   tsearch2 question (was: Poor performance on seq scan) Laszlo Nagy
• 17:13   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Laszlo Nagy
• 18:29   Re: [Fwd: Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared Piñeiro
• 18:46   Re: tsearch2 question (was: Poor performance on seq Luke Lonergan
• 19:18   Re: [Fwd: Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared Dave Dutcher
• 19:21   Re: [Fwd: Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared Alvaro Herrera
• 19:44    jallgood@the-allgoods.net
• 20:53   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Tom Lane
• 21:04   Bad plan for join to aggregate of join. Mischa Sandberg
• 21:07   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Craig A. James
• 21:49   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Laszlo Nagy
• 22:17   Performance With Joins on Large Tables Joshua Marsh
• 22:19   Re: Poor performance on seq scan Luke Lonergan
• 23:42   Re: Bad plan for join to aggregate of join. Tom Lane