Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

15 July 2005

• 00:12   Re: slow joining very large table to smaller ones Dan Harris
• 00:28   Re: lots of updates on small table Alvaro Herrera
• 00:37   Re: lots of updates on small table Alvaro Herrera
• 00:43   Re: performance problems ... 100 cpu utilization David Mitchell
• 02:26   Re: lots of updates on small table alison@mirrabooka.com (Alison Winters)
• 03:50   Re: slow joining very large table to smaller ones Dan Harris
• 04:12   Re: slow joining very large table to smaller ones John A Meinel
• 05:05   Indexing Function called on VACUUM and sorting ? jobapply
• 05:05   Re: large table vs multiple smal tables Kenneth Marshall
• 05:06   PostgresSQL vs. Firebird Relaxin
• 05:08   JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL? Jeffrey W. Baker
• 05:08   Indexing Function called on VACUUM and sorting ? jobapply
• 05:08   Functional index is 5 times slower than the basic one jobapply
• 07:01   What's a lot of connections? Karim Nassar
• 07:14   Re: What's a lot of connections? Jeffrey W. Baker
• 08:20   Re: Profiler for PostgreSQL Andreas Pflug
• 09:17   Re: PostgresSQL vs. Firebird Chris Mair
• 14:16   Re: What's a lot of connections? Tom Lane
• 15:10   Re: slow joining very large table to smaller ones Dan Harris
• 15:21   Re: slow joining very large table to smaller ones Dan Harris
• 16:03   Re: performance problems ... 100 cpu utilization Dennis
• 16:44   Re: slow joining very large table to smaller ones Bruno Wolff III
• 17:39   Re: slow joining very large table to smaller ones PFC
• 20:39   Really bad diskio Ron Wills
• 20:45   Re: Really bad diskio Joshua D. Drake
• 21:01   Re: Really bad diskio Jeffrey W. Baker
• 21:04   Re: Really bad diskio Ron Wills
• 21:07   Re: Really bad diskio Dan Harris
• 21:10   Re: Really bad diskio Alvaro Herrera
• 21:18   Re: Really bad diskio Jeffrey W. Baker
• 21:29   Re: Really bad diskio Ron Wills
• 21:48   Re: Really bad diskio Ron Wills
• 21:54   Re: Really bad diskio Jeffrey W. Baker
• 22:11   Re: Really bad diskio Ron Wills