Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

31 May 2005

• 01:51   Re: poor performance involving a small table Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:06   Re: timestamp indexing Tobias Brox
• 02:20   Re: timestamp indexing Tobias Brox
• 02:31   Re: poor performance involving a small table andrew@pillette.com
• 03:02   Index on a NULL-value Tobias Brox
• 03:18   Re: Index on a NULL-value Bruno Wolff III
• 03:23   Re: Index on a NULL-value Tobias Brox
• 03:34   Re: Index on a NULL-value Tobias Brox
• 03:45   Re: Index on a NULL-value Bruno Wolff III
• 03:47   Re: Index on a NULL-value Tobias Brox
• 04:09   Re: Index on a NULL-value Bruno Wolff III
• 04:18   Re: Index on a NULL-value Tom Lane
• 04:21   Re: Index on a NULL-value Greg Stark
• 05:13   Re: Index on a NULL-value Tom Lane
• 05:59   Re: Index on a NULL-value Tobias Brox
• 09:37   very large table Praveen Raja
• 13:16   SURVEY: who is running postgresql on 8 or more CPUs? Dirk Lutzebäck
• 13:17   Re: slow queries, possibly disk io Josh Close
• 14:06   Re: very large table Tom Lane
• 14:33   Re: slow queries, possibly disk io Tom Lane
• 16:37   Re: slow queries, possibly disk io Josh Close
• 17:02   'Fastest' PC's are slowest in the house Justin Davis
• 18:00   Major flood of mail to lists ... Marc G. Fournier
• 18:49   Re: slow queries, possibly disk io Manfred Koizar
• 19:40   Re: postgresql-8.0.1 performance tuning John A Meinel