Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

6 April 2004

• 00:48   Re: atrocious update performance scott.marlowe
• 01:35   possible improvement between G4 and G5 Qing Zhao
• 01:37   Re: atrocious update performance Stephan Szabo
• 05:46   Re: possible improvement between G4 and G5 Tom Lane
• 07:26   Re: performance comparission postgresql/ms-sql server Shridhar Daithankar
• 08:04   good pc but bad performance,why? huang yaqin
• 11:15   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Richard Huxton
• 12:46   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Bill Moran
• 13:00   Back to Linux 2.6 kernel thoughts... Richard Huxton
• 14:40   Re: performance comparission postgresql/ms-sql server Shridhar Daithankar
• 14:42   Re: performance comparission postgresql/ms-sql server Kaarel
• 15:01   Wierd issues Andrew Matthews
• 15:42   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Tom Lane
• 15:53   Re: possible improvement between G4 and G5 Jim C. Nasby
• 16:22   Re: possible improvement between G4 and G5 Aaron Werman
• 18:51   Re: possible improvement between G4 and G5 Josh Berkus
• 19:16   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 20:22   Re: possible improvement between G4 and G5 Aaron Werman
• 20:26   plan problem Ken Geis
• 21:42   Re: possible improvement between G4 and G5 Josh Berkus