Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

6 February 2004

• 01:32   COPY with INDEXES question Slavisa Garic
• 01:47   Re: COPY with INDEXES question Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:21   Re: COPY with INDEXES question Slavisa Garic
• 06:18   Seq scan on zero-parameters function Octavio Alvarez
• 07:43   Re: Seq scan on zero-parameters function Octavio Alvarez
• 07:50   Re: Seq scan on zero-parameters function Richard Huxton
• 07:58   Increase performance of a UNION query that thakes 655.07 msec to be runned ? Bruno BAGUETTE
• 09:44   Re: 7.3 vs 7.4 performance Hannu Krosing
• 09:45   Re: 7.3 vs 7.4 performance Hannu Krosing
• 13:55   Re: Seq scan on zero-parameters function Tom Lane
• 14:29   Re: Increase performance of a UNION query that thakes 655.07 msec to be runned ? Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: Increase performance of a UNION query that thakes Stephan Szabo
• 15:35   RE : Increase performance of a UNION query that thakes 655.07 msec to be runned ? Bruno BAGUETTE
• 15:40   RE : Increase performance of a UNION query that thakes 655.07 msec to be runned ? Bruno BAGUETTE
• 16:16   Re: RE : Increase performance of a UNION query that thakes Stephan Szabo
• 16:39   Re: 7.3 vs 7.4 performance markw@osdl.org
• 19:43   Re: COPY with INDEXES question Rod Taylor
• 19:43   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Jan Wieck
• 19:52   Re: Database conversion woes... Kevin Carpenter
• 20:36   Why is query selecting sequential? Karl Denninger
• 20:52   Re: Why is query selecting sequential? Josh Berkus
• 21:22   Re: Why is query selecting sequential? Karl Denninger
• 21:37   Re: Why is query selecting sequential? Josh Berkus