Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 July 2023

• 00:11   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Andres Freund
• 00:12   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Tomas Vondra
• 00:27   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Tomas Vondra
• 00:28   Re: Initdb-time block size specification David Christensen
• 00:29   Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace? Bruce Momjian
• 00:29   Re: Initdb-time block size specification David Christensen
• 00:33   Re: pg_upgrade instructions involving "rsync --size-only" might lead to standby corruption? Bruce Momjian
• 00:33   Re: Initdb-time block size specification David Christensen
• 00:36   Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready Bruce Momjian
• 00:39   Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name Nathan Bossart
• 00:40   Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace? Tom Lane
• 00:40   Re: Initdb-time block size specification David Christensen
• 00:42   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Tomas Vondra
• 00:42   Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace? Nathan Bossart
• 00:43   Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace? Nathan Bossart
• 00:53   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Bruce Momjian
• 01:05   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Andres Freund
• 01:09   Re: Extension Enhancement: Buffer Invalidation in pg_buffercache Thomas Munro
• 01:13   Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace? Magnus Hagander
• 01:18   Re: pg_upgrade instructions involving "rsync --size-only" might lead to standby corruption? Nikolay Samokhvalov
• 01:20   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Andres Freund
• 01:21   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Tomas Vondra
• 01:27   Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace? Nathan Bossart
• 01:36   Re: pg_upgrade instructions involving "rsync --size-only" might lead to standby corruption? Bruce Momjian
• 01:37   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Bruce Momjian
• 01:51   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Andres Freund
• 01:56   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Tomas Vondra
• 01:58   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Bruce Momjian
• 01:59   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Andres Freund
• 02:01   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Bruce Momjian
• 02:04   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Andres Freund
• 02:13   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Tomas Vondra
• 02:16   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Bruce Momjian
• 02:18   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Tomas Vondra
• 02:26   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Bruce Momjian
• 02:44   Re: Initdb-time block size specification Andres Freund
• 02:57   RFC: pg_stat_logmsg Joe Conway
• 04:12   Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints Andres Freund
• 04:42   Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby Amit Kapila
• 04:50   Re: Extensible storage manager API - SMGR hook Redux Andres Freund
• 06:20   Re: RFC: pg_stat_logmsg Pavel Stehule
• 07:28   Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER Thomas Munro
• 08:09   Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication vignesh C
• 08:13   Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 Pavel Stehule
• 10:49   Outdated description of PG_CACHE_LINE_SIZE Julien Rouhaud
• 12:02   Re: pg_upgrade instructions involving "rsync --size-only" might lead to standby corruption? Andrey M. Borodin
• 12:04   Re: Do we want a hashset type? Joel Jacobson
• 14:07   Re: MERGE ... RETURNING Dean Rasheed
• 14:31   Re: SPI isolation changes Seino Yuki
• 15:33   Re: MERGE ... WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE Dean Rasheed
• 16:40   possible bug in handling of contrecords in dd38ff28ad (Fix recovery_prefetch with low maintenance_io_concurrency) Tomas Vondra
• 17:02   Re: ProcessStartupPacket(): database_name and user_name truncation Drouvot, Bertrand
• 18:33   Re: Preventing non-superusers from altering session authorization Joseph Koshakow
• 19:25   Re: check_strxfrm_bug() Noah Misch
• 19:39   Re: Does a cancelled REINDEX CONCURRENTLY need to be messy? Thom Brown
• 20:31   Re: ICU locale validation / canonicalization Noah Misch
• 22:52   Re: RFC: pg_stat_logmsg Joe Conway