Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

8 October 2017

• 00:37   [HACKERS] Help required to debug pg_repack breaking logical replication Daniele Varrazzo
• 01:39   [HACKERS] Slow synchronous logical replication konstantin knizhnik
• 01:42   Re: [HACKERS] Slow synchronous logical replication Andres Freund
• 01:58   Re: [HACKERS] Slow synchronous logical replication Konstantin Knizhnik
• 02:40   Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations Nico Williams
• 02:46   Re: [HACKERS] Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra Tom Lane
• 03:22   Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations Petr Jelinek
• 03:56   [HACKERS] Prepared statements assume text type in PG10 Jack Christensen
• 04:10   Re: [HACKERS] tablespaces inside $PGDATA considered harmful Mark Kirkwood
• 05:22   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple Peter Geoghegan
• 05:25   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updatedtuple Alvaro Herrera
• 05:27   Re: [HACKERS] Prepared statements assume text type in PG10 Peter Geoghegan
• 05:31   Re: [HACKERS] Prepared statements assume text type in PG10 Peter Geoghegan
• 06:23   Re: [HACKERS] Prepared statements assume text type in PG10 Tom Lane
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] On markers of changed data Andrey Borodin
• 19:00   Re: [HACKERS] Slow synchronous logical replication Craig Ringer
• 19:21   Re: [HACKERS] Help required to debug pg_repack breaking logical replication Craig Ringer
• 21:11   Re: [HACKERS] On markers of changed data Stephen Frost
• 21:17   Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations Adam Brusselback
• 21:28   Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations Tom Lane
• 22:18   Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations Andres Freund
• 22:24   Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations Tom Lane
• 22:36   [HACKERS] is possible cache tupledesc templates in execution plan? significantperformance issue, maybe bug? Pavel Stehule
• 22:44   Re: [HACKERS] is possible cache tupledesc templates in executionplan? significant performance issue, maybe bug? Andres Freund
• 22:51   [HACKERS] Re: is possible cache tupledesc templates in execution plan?significant performance issue, maybe bug? Pavel Stehule
• 22:57   Re: [HACKERS] is possible cache tupledesc templates in executionplan? significant performance issue, maybe bug? Pavel Stehule
• 22:59   Re: [HACKERS] is possible cache tupledesc templates in executionplan? significant performance issue, maybe bug? Andres Freund
• 23:04   Re: [HACKERS] is possible cache tupledesc templates in executionplan? significant performance issue, maybe bug? Pavel Stehule
• 23:10   Re: [HACKERS] is possible cache tupledesc templates in executionplan? significant performance issue, maybe bug? Pavel Stehule
• 23:23   [HACKERS] Re: is possible cache tupledesc templates in execution plan?significant performance issue, maybe bug? Pavel Stehule
• 23:29   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple Peter Geoghegan