Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations
Date
Msg-id 20171008161804.xmdc7vb22ei66sgz@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations
Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-10-08 11:28:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback@gmail.com> writes:
> > On another note:
> >> turning ORs into UNIONs
> 
> > This is another one which would be incredibly useful for me.  I've had
> > to do this manually for performance reasons far too often.
> 
> Well, maybe you could sign up to help review the open patch for that then:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1001/
> 
> The reason that's not in v10 is we haven't been able to convince
> ourselves whether it's 100% correct.

Unfortunately it won't help in this specific case (no support for UNION,
just UNION ALL), but I thought it might be interesting to reference
https://medium.com/@uwdb/introducing-cosette-527898504bd6
here.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Discussion on missing optimizations