Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

25 June 2016

• 00:10   Re: tuplesort.c's copytup_index() is dead code Peter Geoghegan
• 00:16   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Tom Lane
• 00:18   Re: tuplesort.c's copytup_index() is dead code Tom Lane
• 00:26   Re: tuplesort.c's copytup_index() is dead code Peter Geoghegan
• 01:12   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Gavin Flower
• 01:41   Memory leak in Pl/Python Andrey Zhidenkov
• 01:43   Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). Joshua D. Drake
• 01:45   Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4 Alvaro Herrera
• 02:00   Re: Memory leak in Pl/Python David G. Johnston
• 02:30   Improving executor performance Andres Freund
• 02:31   Re: Improving executor performance Andres Freund
• 03:19   Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres Flavius Anton
• 03:25   Re: Improving executor performance Peter Geoghegan
• 04:54   Re: Memory leak in Pl/Python Andrey Zhidenkov
• 05:16   Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) Craig Ringer
• 06:14   Re: Hash Indexes Amit Kapila
• 10:30   Re: Memory leak in Pl/Python Andrey Zhidenkov
• 10:33   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Amit Kapila
• 10:44   Re: bug in citext's upgrade script for parallel aggregates Andreas Karlsson
• 11:57   Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? Julien Rouhaud
• 16:41   Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) Tom Lane
• 16:45   Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) Tom Lane
• 18:15   Re: Memory leak in Pl/Python Tom Lane
• 18:57   Re: Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps Tom Lane
• 19:07   Re: Rethinking representation of partial-aggregate steps Tom Lane
• 20:30   Better solution to final adjustment of combining Aggrefs Tom Lane