Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

24 August 2013

• 00:08   Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments Heikki Linnakangas
• 00:53   Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments Josh Berkus
• 00:55   Re: Performance problem in PLPgSQL Tom Lane
• 01:07   Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE Tom Lane
• 01:08   What happens at BIND time? Josh Berkus
• 01:15   Re: What happens at BIND time? Tom Lane
• 06:26   Re: Parallel pg_basebackup Peter Eisentraut
• 08:03   Re: Hardware donation Jim Nasby
• 08:03   Re: Reducing size of WAL record headers Jim Nasby
• 12:16   Re: Behaviour of take over the synchronous replication Sawada Masahiko
• 15:39   Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:40   PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE Merlin Moncure
• 16:12   Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE Pavel Stehule
• 17:38   Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup Peter Eisentraut
• 17:41   Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL Peter Eisentraut
• 17:44   Re: Re: Proposal/design feedback needed: WITHIN GROUP (sql standard ordered set aggregate functions) Peter Eisentraut
• 17:47   Re: Backup throttling Peter Eisentraut
• 17:50   Re: pgbench progress report improvements Peter Eisentraut
• 17:56   Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs Peter Eisentraut
• 17:58   Re: Detail part for still waiting for lock log message Peter Eisentraut
• 18:01   Re: Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls Peter Eisentraut
• 20:20   Re: Performance problem in PLPgSQL Marc Cousin
• 20:34   Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE Tom Lane
• 22:17   Re: Performance problem in PLPgSQL Tom Lane
• 22:32   Call for translations Peter Eisentraut
• 23:06   Re: pgbench progress report improvements Fabien COELHO