On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 19:21 +0300, Tarvi Pillessaar wrote:
> About patch:
> Patch is tested against 9.2.4.
> I was not sure that i should check if the lock holder's proclock was
> found (as lock holder's proclock should be always there), check is there
> to be on the safe side, but maybe it's unnecessary.
> If it's not needed then fallback to old behavior (logging without
> detail) is not needed as well.
> And yes, i know that the lock holding time is not actually correct and
> it actually shows milliseconds since transaction start.
>
Please fix this compiler warning:
proc.c: In function ‘ProcSleep’:
proc.c:1258:6: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
