Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

16 March 2010

• 00:41   Re: Getting to beta1 Robert Haas
• 00:46   Re: Ragged latency log data in multi-threaded pgbench Takahiro Itagaki
• 01:13   Re: Should we throw error when converting a nonexistent/ambiguous timestamp? Tom Lane
• 01:22   Re: Should we throw error when converting a nonexistent/ambiguous timestamp? Robert Haas
• 01:35   Re: walreceiver is uninterruptible on win32 Fujii Masao
• 01:37   Re: Should we throw error when converting a nonexistent/ambiguous timestamp? Tom Lane
• 01:59   Re: Ragged latency log data in multi-threaded pgbench Greg Smith
• 02:02   Re: Ragged latency log data in multi-threaded pgbench Tom Lane
• 02:13   Re: Ragged latency log data in multi-threaded pgbench Takahiro Itagaki
• 03:14   Re: Ragged latency log data in multi-threaded pgbench Takahiro Itagaki
• 08:37   [RFC] Comments on PostPic project - Repost Domenico Rotiroti
• 09:07   Re: Getting to beta1 Dimitri Fontaine
• 09:12   Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:50   Bug in 9.0Alpha4 Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 12:05   Re: [RFC] Comments on PostPic project - Repost Albe Laurenz
• 12:14   Re: Bug in 9.0Alpha4 Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 13:36   Re: [RFC] Comments on PostPic project - Repost Domenico Rotiroti
• 14:09   Re: [RFC] Comments on PostPic project - Repost Domenico Rotiroti
• 15:11   Re: Bug in 9.0Alpha4 Alvaro Herrera
• 15:29   An idle thought Greg Stark
• 15:55   Re: An idle thought Tom Lane
• 16:02   Re: [RFC] Comments on PostPic project - Repost Domenico Rotiroti
• 16:53   Re: Bug in 9.0Alpha4 Tom Lane
• 17:00   Re: Bug in 9.0Alpha4 Gokulakannan Somasundaram
• 19:24   parametrized NOTIFY - issue in plpgsql, maybe ToDo Pavel Stehule
• 19:29   Re: parametrized NOTIFY - issue in plpgsql, maybe ToDo Tom Lane
• 19:32   Re: parametrized NOTIFY - issue in plpgsql, maybe ToDo Pavel Stehule
• 19:56   Re: Bug in 9.0Alpha4 Tom Lane
• 22:00   Re: Dyamic updates of NEW with pl/pgsql Florian Pflug