Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

7 July 2005

• 00:17   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Joshua D. Drake
• 00:49   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Oliver Jowett
• 01:21   Re: [INTERFACES] By Passed Domain Constraints Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:38   Mistake in latest plperl patch Joshua D. Drake
• 02:52   PQescapeIdentifier Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:02   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 04:10   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 04:16   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruno Wolff III
• 04:25   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 04:29   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 04:41   Re: Mistake in latest plperl patch Bruce Momjian
• 05:05   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Mark Wong
• 07:28   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs
• 07:31   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Simon Riggs
• 07:54   A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support Koichi Suzuki
• 10:05   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 10:12   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 13:31   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 13:38   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 14:30   windows regression failure - prepared xacts Andrew Dunstan
• 15:03   SQL99 - Nested Tables Darren Alcorn
• 15:03   Re: [INTERFACES] By Passed Domain Constraints Robert Perry
• 15:15   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 15:18   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 15:28   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 15:32   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Greg Stark
• 15:36   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 15:40   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 15:51   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Tom Lane
• 16:00   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 16:08   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Joshua D. Drake
• 16:11   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 16:23   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Bruce Momjian
• 16:40   Must be owner to truncate? Stephen Frost
• 16:52   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Josh Berkus
• 16:57   Re: A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support Josh Berkus
• 16:59   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Josh Berkus
• 17:49   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Tom Lane
• 18:02   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Stephen Frost
• 18:17   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables David Fetter
• 18:52   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Andrew - Supernews
• 19:25   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Darren Alcorn
• 19:25   Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC Kenneth Marshall
• 19:30   8.1dev ssl broke? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:36   Re: 8.1dev ssl broke? Joshua D. Drake
• 19:51   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables Josh Berkus
• 20:10   Re: 8.1dev ssl broke? Michael Fuhr
• 20:21   Re: 8.1dev ssl broke? Joshua D. Drake
• 20:33    Ayush Parashar
• 20:44   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Jim C. Nasby
• 20:56   Multi-byte and client side character encoding tests for copy command.. Ayush Parashar
• 20:58   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Stephen Frost
• 21:27   Re: Must be owner to truncate? Stephen Frost
• 22:59   Pg_autovacuum on FreeBSD Rodrigo Moreno
• 23:09   Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables David Fetter
• 23:17   temp_buffers Joshua D. Drake
• 23:24   Re: temp_buffers Alvaro Herrera