Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

22 June 2000

• 00:11   Re: An idea on faster CHAR field indexing Giles Lean
• 00:15   Re: Thoughts on multiple simultaneous code page support Giles Lean
• 00:17   RE: Big 7.1 open items Mikheev, Vadim
• 00:18   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:26   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:36   RE: Big 7.1 open items Mikheev, Vadim
• 00:43   Re: An idea on faster CHAR field indexing Randall Parker
• 00:50   Re: Thoughts on multiple simultaneous code page support Randall Parker
• 01:30   Re: Big 7.1 open items Bruce Momjian
• 02:01   Re: An idea on faster CHAR field indexing Tom Lane
• 02:03   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 02:08   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:16   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 02:18   Re: An idea on faster CHAR field indexing Tom Lane
• 02:30   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 02:32   Memory management revisions, take 2 Tom Lane
• 02:46   Re: Thoughts on multiple simultaneous code page support Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:47   Re: Makefile.global is kind of a pain Tom Lane
• 02:49   Re: Big 7.1 open items Chris Bitmead
• 03:04   Re: Big 7.1 open items Bruce Momjian
• 03:31   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 04:09   Re: Big 7.1 open items Randall Parker
• 04:30   Re: Thoughts on multiple simultaneous code page support Randall Parker
• 04:45   Re: Big 7.1 open items Don Baccus
• 04:55   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:56   Re: Big 7.1 open items Don Baccus
• 05:31   Re: Big 7.1 open items Philip J. Warner
• 05:37   Re: Big 7.1 open items Philip J. Warner
• 06:00   Re: Thoughts on multiple simultaneous code page support Tom Lane
• 06:06   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 06:19   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 06:55   Re: Big 7.1 open items Philip J. Warner
• 07:45   Re: An idea on faster CHAR field indexing Giles Lean
• 08:06   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:08   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:39   Re: An idea on faster CHAR field indexing Giles Lean
• 10:56   Re: Big 7.1 open items Giles Lean
• 12:59   Re: Changes to functions and triggers darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 13:36   Re: Big 7.1 open items Bruce Momjian
• 14:10   Re: Thoughts on multiple simultaneous code page support Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:24   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 14:29   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 15:51   Proposal: More flexible backup/restore via pg_dump Philip Warner
• 17:12   Re: Thoughts on multiple simultaneous code page support Randall Parker
• 17:16   RE: Big 7.1 open items Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:48   NOTICES about portals Brook Milligan
• 17:58   Re: Thoughts on multiple simultaneous code page support The Hermit Hacker
• 19:14   Re: Big 7.1 open items Bruce Momjian
• 19:17   Interesting mention of PostgreSQL in news Lamar Owen
• 19:23   Re: Interesting mention of PostgreSQL in news teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 19:45   refint/acl problem Kovacs Zoltan Sandor
• 19:45   Re: Interesting mention of PostgreSQL in news Lamar Owen
• 19:50   problem with ALTER GROUP Kovacs Zoltan Sandor
• 20:22   Re: Interesting mention of PostgreSQL in news Bruce Momjian
• 21:07   Re: Big 7.1 open items The Hermit Hacker
• 21:30   Re: Makefile.global is kind of a pain Peter Eisentraut
• 21:30   Re: Big 7.1 open items Peter Eisentraut
• 21:30   Re: Thoughts on multiple simultaneous code page support Tatsuo Ishii
• 21:36   Re: problem with ALTER GROUP Peter Eisentraut
• 21:39   Re: NOTICES about portals Tom Lane
• 21:41   Re: problem with ALTER GROUP Tom Lane
• 22:03   Re: Makefile.global is kind of a pain Tom Lane
• 22:12   Re: NOTICES about portals Brook Milligan
• 22:30   Re: NOTICES about portals Tom Lane
• 22:39   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:01   Re: Big 7.1 open items Chris Bitmead
• 23:42   PGSQL internals question... Chris Bitmead