Mailing lists [pgsql-general]

16 January 2023

• 04:52   Re: does refreshing materialized view make the database bloat? jian he
• 04:58   Re: does refreshing materialized view make the database bloat? David G. Johnston
• 05:29   Re: does refreshing materialized view make the database bloat? jian he
• 05:43   Re: does refreshing materialized view make the database bloat? David G. Johnston
• 08:30   glibc initdb options vs icu compatibility questions (PG15) Robert Sjöblom
• 08:41   RE: Are ZFS snapshots unsafe when PGSQL is spreading through multiple zpools? HECTOR INGERTO
• 08:55   Re: row estimate for partial index Harmen
• 12:48   Why is a Read-only Table Gets Autovacuumed "to prevent wraparound" Fred Habash
• 13:11   Re: Why is a Read-only Table Gets Autovacuumed "to prevent wraparound" Laurenz Albe
• 13:21   Re: Are ZFS snapshots unsafe when PGSQL is spreading through multiple zpools? Laurenz Albe
• 13:26   Re: glibc initdb options vs icu compatibility questions (PG15) Laurenz Albe
• 13:30   Re: AW: AW: [Extern] Re: postgres restore & needed history files Laurenz Albe
• 14:32   Re: Why is a Read-only Table Gets Autovacuumed "to prevent wraparound" Erik Wienhold
• 14:37   RE: Are ZFS snapshots unsafe when PGSQL is spreading through multiple zpools? HECTOR INGERTO
• 14:59   Re: row estimate for partial index Tom Lane
• 15:47   Re: glibc initdb options vs icu compatibility questions (PG15) Joe Conway
• 16:04   No function matches the given name and argument types. arons
• 16:17   Re: No function matches the given name and argument types. Adrian Klaver
• 16:21   Re: No function matches the given name and argument types. Adrian Klaver
• 17:41   Re: No function matches the given name and argument types. arons
• 17:49   Re: No function matches the given name and argument types. Pavel Stehule
• 17:53   Re: No function matches the given name and argument types. David G. Johnston
• 17:57   Re: No function matches the given name and argument types. Christophe Pettus
• 18:59   minor bug Torsten Förtsch
• 19:05   Re: Why is a hash join preferred when it does not fit in work_mem Dimitrios Apostolou
• 21:18   Re: Why is a Read-only Table Gets Autovacuumed "to prevent wraparound" Ron
• 21:46   Re: Why is a Read-only Table Gets Autovacuumed "to prevent wraparound" Rob Sargent
• 23:13   Re: Why is a Read-only Table Gets Autovacuumed "to prevent wraparound" Ron