Mailing lists [pgsql-general]

15 December 2017

• 03:21   User-defined print format for extension-defined types in psql output Peter Devoy
• 04:08   Does the delete+insert is fater and less cpu consumer than update? hmidi slim
• 04:32   Re: Does the delete+insert is fater and less cpu consumer than update? Tom Lane
• 04:44   Re: Does the delete+insert is fater and less cpu consumer than update? David G. Johnston
• 05:08   Re: Does the delete+insert is fater and less cpu consumer thanupdate? legrand legrand
• 08:20   Re: Can postgresql ignore DST ? Venkata B Nagothi
• 09:20   Hot standby failing with PANIC: WAL contains references to invalidpages TAKATSUKA Haruka
• 10:23   Re: Can postgresql ignore DST ? Ben Madin
• 11:17   Re: Can postgresql ignore DST ? Venkata B Nagothi
• 11:55   Re: Can postgresql ignore DST ? John R Pierce
• 13:21   Re: Can postgresql ignore DST ? Laurenz Albe
• 15:59   Re: User-defined print format for extension-defined types in psqloutput Laurenz Albe
• 20:44   Re: Dependency tree to tie type/function deps to a table Jeremy Finzel
• 21:17   Clarification on PL/pgSQL query plan caching George Woodring
• 21:37   pgbench Olga Lytvynova-Bogdanova
• 23:03   Replication questions - read-only and temporary read/write slaves Tiffany Thang
• 23:55   Re: Replication questions - read-only and temporary read/write slaves Magnus Hagander