Mailing lists [pgsql-docs]

1 August 2003

• 00:37   Backup / restore procedure documentation Havard Eidnes
• 01:25   Re: Backup / restore procedure documentation Tom Lane
• 04:32   Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Chad N. Tindel
• 04:53   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Bruce Momjian
• 10:57   Re: Backup / restore procedure documentation Havard Eidnes
• 20:17   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Chad N. Tindel
• 20:43   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls scott.marlowe

2 August 2003

• 01:28   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Chad N. Tindel
• 02:49   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Tom Lane
• 06:34   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Roberto Mello
• 21:21   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Roberto Mello

3 August 2003

• 16:43   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Chad N. Tindel
• 16:43   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Chad N. Tindel
• 17:03   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Tom Lane
• 18:21   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Ian Barwick

4 August 2003

• 11:12   truth table missing values Dennis Björklund
• 13:12   Incorrect REVOKE command in docs Stephen Frost
• 13:25   Re: Incorrect REVOKE command in docs Peter Eisentraut
• 14:21   Re: truth table missing values Peter Eisentraut
• 15:29   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls scott.marlowe
• 15:35   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls scott.marlowe
• 16:19   Re: truth table missing values scott.marlowe
• 16:33   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Josh Berkus
• 16:51   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Josh Berkus
• 16:51   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls scott.marlowe
• 17:28   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Lamar Owen
• 19:23   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls scott.marlowe
• 19:40   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls scott.marlowe
• 20:44   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Chad N. Tindel
• 20:44   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Chad N. Tindel
• 20:44   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Chad N. Tindel
• 20:45   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Chad N. Tindel
• 21:02   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Rod Taylor
• 21:09   Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls Lamar Owen
• 22:44   man pages for v7.4 ... ? Marc G. Fournier

5 August 2003

• 04:29   duplicated index entry found ... The Hermit Hacker
• 14:02   Re: duplicated index entry found ... Tom Lane
• 17:10   Re: man pages for v7.4 ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 17:14   Re: duplicated index entry found ... Peter Eisentraut

7 August 2003

• 18:35   Testing gateway Marc G. Fournier
• 23:06   Error message listing? Josh Berkus
• 23:21   Re: Error message listing? Tom Lane
• 23:35   Re: Error message listing? Josh Berkus

8 August 2003

• 07:29   Re: Error message listing? Peter Eisentraut
• 11:59   Re: Error message listing? Francois Suter
• 13:22   Re: Error message listing? Tom Lane

9 August 2003

• 14:50   Re: Error message listing? elein
• 14:53   Re: Error message listing? Francois Suter

14 August 2003

• 21:38   Inconsistencies in our SGML output Tom Lane

16 August 2003

• 06:31   Copyright (C) 1996-2002 Christoph Haller
• 16:48   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Bruce Momjian
• 23:55   Re: [GENERAL] pam-linux, /etc/shadow : HOW-TO Bruce Momjian

17 August 2003

• 00:42   Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL Bruce Momjian
• 02:16   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Bruce Momjian
• 03:07   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Dan Langille
• 04:38   Re: [BUGS] pg 7.4beta1 doc bug: vacuum not updated Bruce Momjian

18 August 2003

• 00:16   Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL Andrew Sullivan

19 August 2003

• 08:17   Re: Inconsistencies in our SGML output Peter Eisentraut
• 08:18   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Peter Eisentraut
• 10:08   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Dan Langille

20 August 2003

• 08:40   Re: My details 
• 13:38   Time input documentation error Bruno Wolff III
• 20:24   Re: Time input documentation error Tom Lane

21 August 2003

• 02:33   Re: Time input documentation error Bruno Wolff III
• 16:20   Re: [HACKERS] Can't find thread on Linux memory overcommit Josh Berkus

22 August 2003

• 10:11   Re: Your application 

25 August 2003

• 06:26   read commited Dennis Björklund
• 14:45   Re: read commited Tom Lane
• 15:28   Re: read commited Dennis Björklund
• 19:07   Re: [HACKERS] Can't find thread on Linux memory overcommit Andrew Dunstan
• 19:32   LOCK.tag(figuring out granularity of lock) Sumaira Maqsood Ali

26 August 2003

• 05:53   Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference pages? Tom Lane
• 12:12   Re: Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference pages? Bruno Wolff III
• 16:30   Re: Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference pages? Dan Langille
• 16:45   Re: Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference pages? Tom Lane
• 16:48   Re: Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference pages? Dan Langille
• 16:50   Re: Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference pages? Tom Lane
• 17:04   Re: Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference pages? Dan Langille
• 18:27   Changing the sequence owner Dan Langille

28 August 2003

• 01:26   Automatic documentation spell check Peter Eisentraut
• 03:16   Re: Automatic documentation spell check Tom Lane
• 04:06   Re: Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference pages? Chris M
• 04:19   Re: Changing the sequence owner Chris M
• 15:37   undocumented date addition/subtraction operators Tom Lane
• 17:15   Re: Automatic documentation spell check Peter Eisentraut
• 17:48   A question! Nico King

30 August 2003

• 04:53   Re: Automatic documentation spell check Bruce Momjian
• 12:48   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Dan Langille
• 14:15   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:22   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Dan Langille
• 14:33   Re: PostgreSQL Tutorial in Russian Bruce Momjian
• 14:55   Re: PostgreSQL Tutorial in Russian Guillaume LELARGE
• 14:58   Re: PostgreSQL Tutorial in Russian Dan Langille
• 15:37   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Peter Eisentraut
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Dan Langille
• 17:47   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Bruce Momjian
• 21:51   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Tom Lane

31 August 2003

• 18:12   Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? Peter Eisentraut