Re: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Subject Re: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Date
Msg-id xuy8zraun4g.fsf@hoser.devel.redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

> > How compatible with 7.0 and 7.1 be from an application standpoint?
> > Will applications linked with libraries from 7.0 be able to talk to
> > the 7.1 database?  Any changes in library major versions? The other
> > way?
>
> Historically, all applications have been able to talk to newer servers,
> so a 6.4 client can talk to a 7.0 postmaster, and I believe 7.0 clients
> can talk to 7.1 postmasters.

Great - that was what I wanted to know.

> We usually do not go the other way, where 6.5 clients can not talk to
> 6.4 postmasters.  I believe 7.0->7.1 will be able to talk in any
> 7.0.X/7.1 client and server combination.

Thanks!

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: timestamp?
Next
From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)