Re: Re: JDBC Performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gunnar R|nning
Subject Re: Re: JDBC Performance
Date
Msg-id x63di6fodz.fsf@thor.candleweb.no
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: JDBC Performance  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: JDBC Performance  (Peter Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>)
List pgsql-general
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

> Applied, and new files added.
>

Scares me ;-) I just wanted to get some feedback and testers for this code
before actually having it applied. I can also imagine Peter might have some
comments on structure etc. since he got a lot better overview of the JDBC
code as whole.

Well did anyone review the changes or test them out ? The application I'm
testing is hardly representative for all applications, so there may still
be some bugs left in there.

Regards,

    Gunnar

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: CIDR index use for '<<' operator
Next
From: "Vilson farias"
Date:
Subject: Fw: Referencial integrity when there are timestamp primary keys