On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Craig Ringer
<craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:
>
> I'd be looking at management, reliability, backup, integration into the
> rest of the infrastructure, product longevity, support, etc. Performance
> you can always throw hardware at.
And given the relatively high costs of a MSSQL installation, you can
throw a LOT of hardware at a PostgreSQL server.
