Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Date
Msg-id 4BDCDFA8.9090609@postnewspapers.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server  (Thomas Løcke <thomas.granvej6@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 02/05/10 02:47, Thomas Løcke wrote:

> I've not been able to convince them to send me some actual benchmark
> numbers, which actually should turn on quite a few alarms, come to
> think about it.  :o)

Is performance really your #1 criterion anyway?

I'd be looking at management, reliability, backup, integration into the
rest of the infrastructure, product longevity, support, etc. Performance
you can always throw hardware at.

--
Craig Ringer

Tech-related writing: http://soapyfrogs.blogspot.com/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "justin@magwerks.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server