Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stephen
Subject Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test
Date
Msg-id vRxlb.10931$fh3.3653@nntp-post.primus.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to SCSI vs. IDE performance test  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Responses Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test  (Mike Benoit <mikeb@netnation.com>)
List pgsql-general
The SCSI improvement over IDE seems overrated in the test. I would have
expected at most a 30% improvement. Other reviews seem to point out that IDE
performs just as well or better.

See Tom's hardware:
http://www20.tomshardware.com/storage/20020305/index.html

Stephen


"Ron Johnson" <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1066837102.12532.176.camel@haggis...
>
http://hardware.devchannel.org/hardwarechannel/03/10/20/1953249.shtml?tid=20
&tid=38&tid=49
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net
> Jefferson, LA USA
>
> I can't make you have an abortion, but you can *make* me pay
> child support for 18 years? However, if I want the child (and
> all the expenses that entails) for the *rest*of*my*life*, and you
> don't want it for 9 months, tough luck???
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Recomended FS
Next
From: Oksana Yasynska
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql: return multiple result sets or temp table