Re: index vs. seq scan choice? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From PFC
Subject Re: index vs. seq scan choice?
Date
Msg-id op.tsvh9ra1cigqcu@apollo13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: index vs. seq scan choice?  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
List pgsql-general
> Would it be possible to look at a much larger number of samples during
> analyze,
> then look at the variation in those to generate a reasonable number of
> pg_statistic "samples" to represent our estimate of the actual
> distribution?
> More datapoints for tables where the planner might benefit from it, fewer
> where it wouldn't.

    Maybe it would be possible to take note somewhere of the percentage of
occurence of the most common value (in the OP's case, about 3%), in which
case a quick decision can be taken to use the index without even looking
at the value, if we know the most common one is below the index use
threshold...

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Michael Harris \(BR/EPA\)"
Date:
Subject: ERROR: cache lookup failed for type 0
Next
From: "Cyril VELTER"
Date:
Subject: Re: Winsock error 10035 while trying to upgrade from 8.0 to 8.2