Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Russ Brown
Subject Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker
Date
Msg-id op.syhrinic2ilifp@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker  (Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:23:45 -0700, Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de>
wrote:
> But trac (http://www.edgewall.com/trac/ ) does support it. I'm running
> it for quite a time and very much like it. Of course, trac is SVN only,
> so this might be a show stopper unfortunately :(
>
> Regards
> Tino
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Trac is *very* nice. We're using it in combination with SVK: branching
made easy.

Trac's source/revision browser is excellent and SVK's merge tracking is
fast and very easy. I can't comment on the PostgreSQL implementation
though as we've been using it for quite a while: well before that came in
so we're still on the SQLite backend.

Has there ever been any discussion about moving away from CVS? We couldn't
possibly go back to it now.

--

Russ

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Vivek Khera
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker
Next
From: Dan Armbrust
Date:
Subject: fine tuned database dump/reload?