Re: Looking for tips - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From PFC
Subject Re: Looking for tips
Date
Msg-id op.st6c1qolth1vuj@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Looking for tips  (Oliver Crosby <ryusei@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
    I can't say wether MySQL is faster for very small queries (like
SELECT'ing one row based on an indexed field).
    That's why I was asking you about the language...

    I assume you're using a persistent connection.
    For simple queries like this, PG 8.x seemed to be a lot faster than PG
7.x. Have you tried 8 ?
    I was asking you which language, because for such really small queries
you have to take into account the library overhead. For instance, in PHP a
simple query can be 10 times slower in Postgres than in MySQL and I
believe it is because php's MySQL driver has seen a lot of optimization
whereas the postgres driver has not. Interestingly, the situation is
reversed with Python : its best postgres driver (psycopg 2) is a lot
faster than the MySQL adapter, and faster than both php adapters (a lot
faster).

    The same query can get (this is from the back of my head):

PHP+Postgres        3-5 ms
Python+MySQL    1ms
PHP+MySQL        0.5 ms
Python+Postgres    0.15 ms

And yes, I had queries executing in 150 microseconds or so, this includes
time to convert the results to native python objects ! This was on a loop
of 10000 times the same query. But psycopg2 is fast. The overhead for
parsing a simple query and fetching just a row is really small.

This is on my Centrino 1.6G laptop.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Looking for tips
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Looking for tips