Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From PFC
Subject Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Date
Msg-id op.s8me8my1cigqcu@apollo13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs  (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
List pgsql-performance
    Have a look at this Wikipedia page which outlines some differences
between the AMD and Intel versions of 64-bit :

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EM64T

> It isn't only Postgres. I work on a number of other server applications
> that also run much faster on Opterons than the published benchmark
> figures would suggest they should. They're all compiled with gcc4,
> so possibly there's a compiler issue. I don't run Windows on any
> of our Opteron boxes so I can't easily compare using the MS compiler.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ron Peacetree
Date:
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs