Hi,
On 2026-02-19 14:01:15 -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> The hash functions of some types are ... peculiar (partially due to
> cross-type hashjoin support).
In case you want a reference for said peculiarity, look at this:
=# SELECT lower, upper, lower | upper as V, hashint8(lower | upper) FROM (SELECT (i) as lower, ((i)::int8 << 32) as
upperFROM generate_series(0, 5) g(i));
┌───────┬─────────────┬─────────────┬────────────┐
│ lower │ upper │ v │ hashint8 │
├───────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼────────────┤
│ 0 │ 0 │ 0 │ -272711505 │
│ 1 │ 4294967296 │ 4294967297 │ -272711505 │
│ 2 │ 8589934592 │ 8589934594 │ -272711505 │
│ 3 │ 12884901888 │ 12884901891 │ -272711505 │
│ 4 │ 17179869184 │ 17179869188 │ -272711505 │
│ 5 │ 21474836480 │ 21474836485 │ -272711505 │
└───────┴─────────────┴─────────────┴────────────┘
(6 rows)
Which obviously could have some ... fun consequences.
Whoever chose to implement the cross type compatibility by
a) using int4 as the hash "domain", instead of always hashing 8 bytes
b) implementing int8 by doubling up the high 32bits into the lower 32 bits,
instead of hashint4 iff the value value fits into 32bits and the full 8
bytes otherwise
did us really no service.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
