Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog?? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From James Cloos
Subject Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
Date
Msg-id m3vd3p2o9l.fsf@jhcloos.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
List pgsql-admin
>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

TL> It *is* configurable: make pg_xlog a symlink.

I notice that everyone suggests using a symlink, but I never see anyone
suggest just mounting a filesystem there.

Is there a (technical) reason for that?  Or is a symlink just though to
be easier to explain?

-JimC
--
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Richard Broersma
Date:
Subject: Re: implement BLP model on Postgresql db
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??