Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog?? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Craig James
Subject Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
Date
Msg-id 4CEAC270.6040608@emolecules.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??  (James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On 11/22/10 10:42 AM, James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>  writes:
>
> TL>  It *is* configurable: make pg_xlog a symlink.
>
> I notice that everyone suggests using a symlink, but I never see anyone
> suggest just mounting a filesystem there.
>
> Is there a (technical) reason for that?  Or is a symlink just though to
> be easier to explain?

I think it's a case of, "If you know how do do this, you don't have to ask."

Craig

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??