now() vs 'epoch'::timestamp - Mailing list pgsql-general

From James Cloos
Subject now() vs 'epoch'::timestamp
Date
Msg-id m3twwzfzte.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: now() vs 'epoch'::timestamp
Re: now() vs 'epoch'::timestamp
Re: now() vs 'epoch'::timestamp
List pgsql-general
I've for some time used:

   (now()::timestamp without time zone - 'epoch'::timestamp without time zone)::reltime::integer

to get the current seconds since the epoch.  The results are consistant
with date +%s.

(Incidently, is there a better way in 9.4?)

But I found the 'epoch'::timestamp + $THAT_VALUE::reltime was off.

I consitantly get 1970-01-01 06:00 plus a fraction of a second from:

select now() -  ((now()::timestamp without time zone - 'epoch'::timestamp without time
zone)::reltime::integer)::reltime;

The machines on which I've tried it all have localtime == UTC.

Am I missing something obvious?

Also, is there any way to get the equiv of date +%s%N as a numeric or a
double precision?

-JimC
--
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: TonyS
Date:
Subject: Re: Would like to know how analyze works technically
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: now() vs 'epoch'::timestamp