Re: now() vs 'epoch'::timestamp - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: now() vs 'epoch'::timestamp
Date
Msg-id 26071.1427915879@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to now() vs 'epoch'::timestamp  (James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>)
List pgsql-general
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> writes:
> I've for some time used:
>    (now()::timestamp without time zone - 'epoch'::timestamp without time zone)::reltime::integer

> to get the current seconds since the epoch.  The results are consistant
> with date +%s.

> (Incidently, is there a better way in 9.4?)

> But I found the 'epoch'::timestamp + $THAT_VALUE::reltime was off.

> I consitantly get 1970-01-01 06:00 plus a fraction of a second from:

> select now() -  ((now()::timestamp without time zone - 'epoch'::timestamp without time
zone)::reltime::integer)::reltime;

"reltime" doesn't have fractional-second precision, so you lose whatever
part of the original timestamp difference was fractional.

"reltime" is deprecated too, and will go away someday (probably long
before this calculation starts to overflow an int, in 2038), so you
really don't want to be using it.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: now() vs 'epoch'::timestamp
Next
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: Re: Would like to know how analyze works technically