Re: Ok, why isn't it using *this* index? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Doug McNaught
Subject Re: Ok, why isn't it using *this* index?
Date
Msg-id m3bsqgm9wa.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Ok, why isn't it using *this* index?  (Paul Tomblin <ptomblin@xcski.com>)
List pgsql-general
Paul Tomblin <ptomblin@xcski.com> writes:

> Does anybody know if the RPM that comes with RedHat 7.0 will work with
> RedHat 6.2?  I've just upgraded my workstation machine to RedHat 7.0, and
> I want to wait a bit before upgrading my server as well.  (If only because
> lpr suddenly stopped working with the last "update" from RedHat.)

It's unlikely that the binary RPM will work, but if you get the source
RPM it *should* build on 6.2, though you might have to upgrade RPM on
your 6.2 machine (if you haven't already).

I'm running 7.1beta (compiled from source tarball) on multiple 6.2
machines.  It's not too painful to manage because everything goes into
/usr/local/pgsql by default--it doesn't scatter files all over the
machine.

-Doug

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Paul Tomblin
Date:
Subject: Re: Ok, why isn't it using *this* index?
Next
From: Murakami
Date:
Subject: pg_ctl stop returns error