Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> By reading this thread, -1 for the addition of a new GUC parameter related
> to cascading, it looks like an overkill for the possible gain. And +1 for
> the removal of WAL file once it is replayed in archive recovery if
> cascading replication is not allowed. However, what about
Well, we still don't register standby servers, so I vote against early
removal of files that you have no possible way to know if they are still
useful or not. We need something smarter here. Please.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support