Re: pg_dump with low priority? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Douglas McNaught
Subject Re: pg_dump with low priority?
Date
Msg-id m2hdb9r7y8.fsf@Douglas-McNaughts-Powerbook.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_dump with low priority?  (Bryan Field-Elliot <bryan_lists@netmeme.org>)
List pgsql-general
Bryan Field-Elliot <bryan_lists@netmeme.org> writes:

> We have a huge database which must be backed up every day with pg_dump.
> The problem is, it takes around half an hour to produce the dump file, and
> all other processes on the same box are starved for cycles (presumably due
> to I/O) during the dump. It's not just an inconvenience, it's now evolved
> into a serious problem that needs to be addressed.

You should probably use 'top' and 'vmstat' or 'iostat' to make sure
the problem is what you think it is.  Guessing is usually a bad idea.  :)

That said, I/O starvation is the most likely candidate.

> Is there any mechanism for running pg_dump with a lower priority? I don't
> mind if the backup takes two hours instead of half an hour, as long as
> other processes were getting their fair share of cycles.

Unfortunately, changing the CPU priority with 'nice' doesn't generally
affect I/O bandwidth (since an I/O bound process doesn't use much
CPU).  I think there has been some work on I/O priorities in the Linux
kernel, but I'm not sure where that is.

Are you putting the dump file on the same device as the database lives
on?  If so, moving it to a different device/controller would take some
of the write load off your database disk.

You could also send the dump file over the network to another machine
rather than saving it locally, which would do the above and also
(probably) slow down the whole dump process, depending on the relative
speeds of your disk and your network.

-Doug

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Kretschmer
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump with low priority?
Next
From: Jon Lapham
Date:
Subject: Re: How much slower are numerics?