Re: pg_dump with low priority? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andreas Kretschmer
Subject Re: pg_dump with low priority?
Date
Msg-id 20051022133610.GA3800@kaufbach.delug.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_dump with low priority?  (Bryan Field-Elliot <bryan_lists@netmeme.org>)
List pgsql-general
Bryan Field-Elliot <bryan_lists@netmeme.org> schrieb:
> Is there any mechanism for running pg_dump with a lower priority? I don't mind
> if the backup takes two hours instead of half an hour, as long as other
> processes were getting their fair share of cycles.

You can use 'nice', see see the man-page.


Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe.              N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Johan Wehtje
Date:
Subject: Re: PgInstallerfor 8.1 beta 3 missing Postgis?
Next
From: Douglas McNaught
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump with low priority?