Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema
Date
Msg-id m21u8a9enw.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> While having one place to put everything sounds great, it doesn't do a
> whole lot of good if you consider conflicts- either because you want
> multiple versions available or because there just happens to be some
> overlap in function names (or similar).  There are also extensions which
> have more than just functions in them but also tables, which increases
> the chances of a conflict happening.  Having the extension authors end
> up having to prefix everything with the name of the extension to avoid
> conflicts would certainly be worse than actually using schemas.

Now you're not talking about *default* settings anymore, or are you?

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON and unicode surrogate pairs