Re: Why JDBC 1? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Rene Pijlman
Subject Re: Why JDBC 1?
Date
Msg-id lisfptov9m4vbe2aq1kkfl9eb9fjfduf7a@4ax.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why JDBC 1?  (Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>)
Responses Re: Why JDBC 1?
List pgsql-jdbc
On 04 Sep 2001 13:22:33 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> Isn't the JDBC 2 driver also an implementation of JDBC 1?
>Yes, it is, but many of the libraries, and methods which are used in
>version 2 of the driver aren't available in jdk1 so it won't compile or
>run.

Ah, I see. And I assume we support JDBC 1 for applets that need
to run in popular browsers with a JVM 1.

Has it been discussed before when and how we can stop
maintaining two versions?

Are people really still using JDBC 1?

Regards,
René Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Rene Pijlman
Date:
Subject: Fix for 2 test cases of JDBC test suite
Next
From: "Dave Cramer"
Date:
Subject: Re: error - NOTICE: current transaction...MORE DETAIL...