Re: Why JDBC 1? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Why JDBC 1?
Date
Msg-id 999624153.1559.12.camel@inspiron.cramers
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why JDBC 1?  (Rene Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>)
Responses Re: Why JDBC 1?  (Rene Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Yes, it is, but many of the libraries, and methods which are used in
version 2 of the driver aren't available in jdk1 so it won't compile or
run.

Dave
On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 12:50, Rene Pijlman wrote:
> Perhaps this is a silly question, but why do we have separate
> JDBC 1 and 2 drivers?
>
> Isn't the JDBC 2 driver also an implementation of JDBC 1?
>
> Regards,
> René Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>




pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Rene Pijlman
Date:
Subject: Re: Troubles using German Umlauts with JDBC
Next
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Troubles using German Umlauts with JDBC