Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl.pgsql-general@telemetry.co.uk> writes:
>> Do any special precautions need to be taken when PQNotifies is being
>> called, to make sure that nothing else is referencing the handle?
>
> It's pretty much the same as any other operation on a PGconn: if there
> could be more than one thread touching the connection object
> concurrently, you'd be well advised to add some application-level
> locking.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/libpq-threading.html
>
> The lack of any such locking inside libpq is partly historical, and
> partly because in many practical situations you'll need application-side
> locks anyway to protect application data structures associated with the
> connection.
Thanks, Tom. I'm fairly happy with the ways I've used it so far, but I'm
just trying to think ahead for the future.
In the case of Delphi/Lazarus, where you can have multiple queries on
top of the same connection object, my experience so far is that using
the connection object's handle is safe. But I think that to be
absolutely confident of that I need to do some tracing, and find out
under what circumstance calls are being issued directly against that
handle rather than it just being a placeholder for authentication etc.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
