Greg Smith wrote:
> On 05/01/2011 01:50 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>> Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a
>> limited number of rows
>
>
> Did you find this via
> http://www.reversecurity.com/2011/04/new-details-from-psn-hack.html ?
> That was the only Google-indexed source leading to it I found. I just
> left a note there about the silliness of these claims. I could run more
> than a 10M row PostgreSQL instance on my phone. Unless there's a new
> 16-bit only Vic 20 port of PostgreSQL available or something, it's seems
> unlikely the data had to be partitioned due to any hard limit.
Yes, via Google. I was digging around for any information about what
sort of access and APIs the network made available to end-user (or
ersatz developer) systems.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
