Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date
Msg-id h2t407d949e1005051847r7e14eddcw5cab89584ab6e43c@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> One reason I believe this isn't so critical as all that is that it only
> matters for cases where the operation on the master took an exclusive
> lock.

Uhm, or a vacuum ran. Or a HOT page cleanup occurred, or a btree page
split deleted old tuples.

-- 
greg


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: On a somewhat disappointing correspondence