Glen Parker wrote:
> pg_dump is not acceptable to us because of the potential to lose many
> hours of valuable data. Why would pg_dump even be relevant to this
> discussion? PITR offers a benefit that pg_dump does not, a benefit that
> we, and countless other organizations, obviously find useful. Suggesting
> that a person who's been managing PG in a commercial setting since
> version 6.4 should just use pg_dump as an alternative to PITR is, well,
> rather insulting.
Dude, you were the one who started with calling other people's ideas "silly".
To be aggrieved when they respond in kind is, well, silly.
--
Lew
