Re: [HACKERS] Functions Immutable but not parallel safe? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?
Date
Msg-id fd99bfaf-7047-c4ae-8d19-ec4b7ac23b11@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/5/17 12:26, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 4/5/17 09:58, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> - Maybe add a check to opr_sanity to make sure the default set of
>>>> functions is configured the way we want?
>>> That seems like a good idea.
>>
>> patch
> 
> LGTM

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan