Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
Date
Msg-id cb6d266f-268d-14de-264b-45c962c9d42b@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/5/17 19:14, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On 2017-02-28 22:30:16 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2017-02-28 23:42:45 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 1/26/17 22:46, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> On 2016-09-30 15:24:09 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>>> Yeah, I have committed a few of the patches now and I'll close the CF
>>>>> entry now.  Thanks for your research.
>>>>
>>>> Are you planning to push more of these at some point?
>>>
>>> Sure, let's take a look.
>> [  partial review ]
> 
> Are you planning to get any of this into v10?  There's one or two
> patches here that could qualify as bugfixes (the GinTernary stuff), but
> the rest doesn't strike me as something that should be committed at the
> tail end of the merge window.

Done.

I'll keep refining the keywords issue based on your feedback.  That
might be something to look into early in PG11.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: new set of psql patches for loading (saving) datafrom (to) text, binary files
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?