Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date
Msg-id fd86b104f967e28c733167571551652e0d1a7d28.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 15:55 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I'm confused.  We are not going to try to change existing databases
> to a
> different collation provider during pg_upgrade, are we?

No, certainly not.

I interpreted Pavel's comments as a comparison of ICU and libc in
general and not specific to this patch. Changing providers obviously
requires an index rebuild to be safe.


--
Jeff Davis
PostgreSQL Contributor Team - AWS





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing cases from SPI_result_code_string()
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: meson: Non-feature feature options