Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date
Msg-id 96ab0022-b629-2e99-9a4f-f1c886584cd3@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
List pgsql-hackers
On 17.02.23 21:43, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> select row_number() over (order by nazev collate "cs-x-icu"), nazev
>> from obce
>> except select row_number() over (order by nazev collate "cs_CZ"),
>> nazev from obce;
>>
>> returns a not empty set. So minimally for Czech collate, an index
>> rebuild is necessary
> Yes, that's true of any locale change, provider change, or even
> provider version change.

I'm confused.  We are not going to try to change existing databases to a 
different collation provider during pg_upgrade, are we?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: ICU locale validation / canonicalization
Next
From: Alexander Lakhin
Date:
Subject: Re: windows CI failing PMSignalState->PMChildFlags[slot] == PM_CHILD_ASSIGNED