Re: "IS NOT DOCUMENT" is missing - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: "IS NOT DOCUMENT" is missing
Date
Msg-id fd2f903b-fbd4-8eaf-8152-5fb1eb595f59@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "IS NOT DOCUMENT" is missing  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: "IS NOT DOCUMENT" is missing  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-docs
On 3/30/18 10:40, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:56:32AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
>> 2018-03-09 0:10 GMT-03:00 PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>:
>>> From testing, it seems like PostgreSQL supports the syntax "IS NOT DOCUMENT"
>>> in addition to "IS DOCUMENT", similar to "IS NOT NULL", "IS NOT FALSE", etc,
>>> however this does not appear to be documented, only "IS DOCUMENT" is.
>>>
>> It has been like that since day 1. I'm not sure why it was not
>> documented. It already has some tests. I'll bet that was an oversight.
>> Should we repeat the statement in another item (like the attached
>> patch)? Another option is to add a statement in the "IS DOCUMENT"
>> item. I'm afraid that NULL return wouldn't be clear.
>>
> 
> Patch applied and backpatched to Postgres 10.  Thank.s

Per the nearby discussion, this should probably also be backpatched further.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Blanks in the first line before the first word in the code boxes
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Blanks in the first line before the first word in the code boxes