Re: "IS NOT DOCUMENT" is missing - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: "IS NOT DOCUMENT" is missing
Date
Msg-id 20180402204159.GA30362@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "IS NOT DOCUMENT" is missing  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-docs
On Mon, Apr  2, 2018 at 11:51:50AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/30/18 10:40, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:56:32AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> >> 2018-03-09 0:10 GMT-03:00 PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>:
> >>> From testing, it seems like PostgreSQL supports the syntax "IS NOT DOCUMENT"
> >>> in addition to "IS DOCUMENT", similar to "IS NOT NULL", "IS NOT FALSE", etc,
> >>> however this does not appear to be documented, only "IS DOCUMENT" is.
> >>>
> >> It has been like that since day 1. I'm not sure why it was not
> >> documented. It already has some tests. I'll bet that was an oversight.
> >> Should we repeat the statement in another item (like the attached
> >> patch)? Another option is to add a statement in the "IS DOCUMENT"
> >> item. I'm afraid that NULL return wouldn't be clear.
> >>
> > 
> > Patch applied and backpatched to Postgres 10.  Thank.s
> 
> Per the nearby discussion, this should probably also be backpatched further.

OK, backpatched through 9.3.


-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Blanks in the first line before the first word in the code boxes
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Synopsis of SELECT statement: UNION, INTERSECTION, EXCEPT